Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Prestige Care, Inc., 1:17-cv-01299-AWI-SAB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171206b37 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 18) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On December 1, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to extend time for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The stipulation continues the mandatory scheduling conference to September 2018. However, the Court declines to continue the scheduling conference for the proposed amount of time. The Court shall continue the scheduling conference to May of 2018. If the partie
More

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

(ECF No. 18)

On December 1, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to extend time for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The stipulation continues the mandatory scheduling conference to September 2018. However, the Court declines to continue the scheduling conference for the proposed amount of time. The Court shall continue the scheduling conference to May of 2018. If the parties determine that a further continuance is necessary, they may file a stipulation prior to the May scheduling conference.

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. Defendants' shall file a response to the complaint on or before January 23, 2018. 2. Any motion filed in response to the EEOC's complaint shall be set in accord with Local Rule 230; and 3. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued to May 31, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer