Staedtler v. Berryhill, 16-6291. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180227c63
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22 nd day of February, 2018, after review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore Wells, U d States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Plaintiffs Request for Review GRANTED. 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge sh
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22 nd day of February, 2018, after review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore Wells, U d States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Plaintiffs Request for Review GRANTED. 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge sho..
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2018, after review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore Wells, U · d States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Plaintiffs Request for Review GRANTED.
3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge should (1) consider the record evidence dated June 30, 1993 through Plaintiffs date last insured, December 31, 1993, and reassess Plaintiffs claim in light of that evidence; (2) engage a medical consultant in accordance with SSR 83-20, if appropriate; (3) reconsider the proper weight to be accorded Dr. Goldhammer's opinion; and (4) reconsider the weight to be accorded Don Staedtler's statements as to Plaintiffs symptoms.
4. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner of Social Security.
Source: Leagle
