Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. DANIELS, 2:15-CR-44 (01). (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150828964 Visitors: 35
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY TERENCE P. KEMP , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts one (1) and two (2)of the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts one (1) and two (2)of the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense.

The plea agreement contains a binding agreement as to the guideline sentencing factors and calculations and the sentence is up to the District Judge to determine if that part of the agreement is appropriate. If the District Judge does so determine, I RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be rejected and the defendant should be allowed to with draw the guilty plea.

The Defendant remains on bond pending sentencing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer