Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Whitney W. v. Berryhill, 6:17-cv-00972-CL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20190429f22 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL J. McSHANE , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 22, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although the Commissioner of Social Security filed no objections, I have reviewed the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441 , 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude that the R&R is correct. Judge Clarke's R&
More

OPINION AND ORDER

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 22, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although the Commissioner of Social Security filed no objections, I have reviewed the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude that the R&R is correct. Judge Clarke's R&R is adopted in full. Accordingly, and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this case REMANDED for immediate payment of benefits

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. In the interest of privacy, this Opinion and Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in the case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer