FORESTER v. ASTRUE, 11-4345. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120627d40
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief Statement of Issues in Support of his Request for Review (Doc. No. 9), Defendant's Response to the Request for Review (Doc. No. 10), and Plaintiff's Reply thereto (Doc. No. 12), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 13), to which no objections were filed pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief Statement of Issues in Support of his Request for Review (Doc. No. 9), Defendant's Response to the Request for Review (Doc. No. 10), and Plaintiff's Reply thereto (Doc. No. 12), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 13), to which no objections were filed pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72...
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief Statement of Issues in Support of his Request for Review (Doc. No. 9), Defendant's Response to the Request for Review (Doc. No. 10), and Plaintiff's Reply thereto (Doc. No. 12), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 13), to which no objections were filed pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.1.IV.a, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
Source: Leagle
