Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cox v. Berryhill, 16-5434. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181219f39 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT PAUL S. DIAMOND , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, after careful and independent review of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Defendant's Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review (Doc. No. 12), Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), Magistrate Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff's Object
More

JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, after careful and independent review of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Defendant's Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review (Doc. No. 12), Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), Magistrate Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 21), and Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 25), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff's Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; and 4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer