Baker v. Collins, 3:19-cv-294. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200109a12
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 8) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 7). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 8) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 7). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the M..
More
RECOMMITTAL ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 8) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 7).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
