SCHRACK v. R+L CARRIERS, INC., C-1-10-603. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120323c21
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 62) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The R
Summary: ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 62) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Re..
More
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 62) to which neither party has objected.
Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 62) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (doc. no. 28) is DENIED.
This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate for further proceedings according to law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
