Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lomax v. Saul, 19-227. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200131d68 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH T. HEY , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Plaintiff's brief (14), the response (Doc. 15), reply (Doc. 18), Defendant's motion to stay (Doc. 16), the response (Doc. 17), and the Third Circuit's decision in Cirko v. Commissioner of Social Security and Bizarre v. Commissioner of Social Security , ___ F.3d ___, 2020 WL 370832 (3d Cir. Jan. 23, 2020), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion to stay is denied as moot. 2. Judgm
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Plaintiff's brief (14), the response (Doc. 15), reply (Doc. 18), Defendant's motion to stay (Doc. 16), the response (Doc. 17), and the Third Circuit's decision in Cirko v. Commissioner of Social Security and Bizarre v. Commissioner of Social Security, ___ F.3d ___, 2020 WL 370832 (3d Cir. Jan. 23, 2020), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion to stay is denied as moot. 2. Judgment is entered REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for the purposes of this remand only and the relief sought by Plaintiff is GRANTED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication. 3. On remand, the case will be considered by a constitutionally appointed ALJ other than the one who previously adjudicated Plaintiff's claim. 4. The clerk of Court is hereby directed to mark this case closed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer