Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RILEY v. U.S., 2:07-CR-220(1). (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20120601h58 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a federal prisoner, brings this motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, asserting, inter alia, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Respondent has filed a request to hold the case in abeyance pending Petitioner's written waiver of his attorney-client privilege in order to obtain an affidavit from defense counsel in response to Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of couns
More

ORDER

NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner, a federal prisoner, brings this motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, asserting, inter alia, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Respondent has filed a request to hold the case in abeyance pending Petitioner's written waiver of his attorney-client privilege in order to obtain an affidavit from defense counsel in response to Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Doc. No. 246.

Petitioner has implicitly waived his attorney-client privilege as it relates to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See In re Lott, 424 F.3d 446, 452-54 (6th Cir. 2005)(citing Johnson v. Alabama, 256 F.3d 1156, 1178 (11th Cir. 2001)("By alleging that his attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel in their choice of a defense strategy, [Petitioner] put at issue — and thereby waived — any privilege that might apply to the contents of his conversations with those attorneys to the extent those conversations bore on his attorneys' strategic choices")(other citations omitted)). "It has long been the rule in the federal courts that, where a habeas petitioner raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, he waives the attorney-client privilege as to all communications with his allegedly ineffective lawyer." Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 716 (9th Cir. 2003); see also United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.3d 1285, 1292 (2nd Cir. 1991)(attorney-client "privilege may implicitly be waived when defendant asserts a claim that in fairness requires examination of protected communications"); Tasby v. United States, 504 F.2d 332, 336 (8th Cir. 1975)("Surely a client is not free to make various allegations of misconduct and incompetence while the attorney's lips are sealed by invocation of the attorney-client privilege."). The Court will therefore grant Respondent's request that Petitioner formally waive the privilege.

Respondent's request to hold this case in abeyance pending Petitioner's written waiver of his attorney-client privilege, Doc. No. 246, is GRANTED.

Petitioner is DIRECTED to submit a written waiver of his attorney-client privilege as it pertains to the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel actually asserted in this action. The written waiver must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer