Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOEHM v. FUTURE TECH TODAY, INC., 3:12-CV-831-FDW-DCK. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20130604a22 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 10) filed by Justin A. Jernigan, concerning Randall B. Bateman on May 30, 2013. Mr. Bateman seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant AAA Production, Inc. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in acc
More

ORDER

DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 10) filed by Justin A. Jernigan, concerning Randall B. Bateman on May 30, 2013. Mr. Bateman seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant AAA Production, Inc. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 10) is GRANTED. Mr. Bateman is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant AAA Production, Inc.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer