Melo v. State, 6:15-cv-02177-MC. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20160212b37
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL McSHANE , District Judge . Based on the issues presented in Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 17, the court VACATES its dismissal order in part as to Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) against Defendant Steven R. Fletcher, M.D. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for NIED does not arise out of the nucleus of operative facts common to the claims over which this Court may properly exercise jurisdiction, and the C
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL McSHANE , District Judge . Based on the issues presented in Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 17, the court VACATES its dismissal order in part as to Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) against Defendant Steven R. Fletcher, M.D. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for NIED does not arise out of the nucleus of operative facts common to the claims over which this Court may properly exercise jurisdiction, and the Co..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL McSHANE, District Judge.
Based on the issues presented in Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 17, the court VACATES its dismissal order in part as to Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) against Defendant Steven R. Fletcher, M.D.
The Court finds that Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for NIED does not arise out of the nucleus of operative facts common to the claims over which this Court may properly exercise jurisdiction, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over that claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
