LM RESTAURANTS, INC. v. ALE YEAH!, INC., 3:15-cv-00354-MOC-DSC. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160701g14
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement. Having considered plaintiff's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement (#45) be calendared for hearing during the court's next available civil motions day in the Charlotte Division. In preparing for the hearing, the parties are advised to consider
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement. Having considered plaintiff's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement (#45) be calendared for hearing during the court's next available civil motions day in the Charlotte Division. In preparing for the hearing, the parties are advised to consider t..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement. Having considered plaintiff's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on Settlement (#45) be calendared for hearing during the court's next available civil motions day in the Charlotte Division.
In preparing for the hearing, the parties are advised to consider this court's decision underlying the affirmance in Campbell v. Adkisson, Sherbert & Associates, 546 Fed. Appx. 146, 148 (4th Cir. 2013), which addressed a similar issue.
Source: Leagle
