Hodge v. Saul, 1:18CV206. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190920997
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On August 9, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 19) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Commissioner has responded (Doc. 20). The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17),
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On August 9, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 19) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Commissioner has responded (Doc. 20). The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On August 9, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 19) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Commissioner has responded (Doc. 20).
The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
