Slaughter v. Link, 16-4143. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180504b84
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 30th day of April 2018, upon careful consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 11), the Government's Response (Doc. No. 18), Petitioner's Reply (Doc. No. 21), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. No. 22), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 30th day of April 2018, upon careful consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 11), the Government's Response (Doc. No. 18), Petitioner's Reply (Doc. No. 21), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. No. 22), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and R..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of April 2018, upon careful consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 11), the Government's Response (Doc. No. 18), Petitioner's Reply (Doc. No. 21), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. No. 22), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle