Laureano v. City of New York, 19cv7077 (DLC). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191218948
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENISE COTE , District Judge . The complaint in the above-captioned case was filed on July 29, 2019. Under Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., a plaintiff has 90 days to serve the complaint, or the action must be dismissed. On October 9, the plaintiff requested summonses for two of the three defendants in this action. It has not obtained a summons for the third. As of the date of this Order, no affidavit of service has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the initial pretrial c
Summary: ORDER DENISE COTE , District Judge . The complaint in the above-captioned case was filed on July 29, 2019. Under Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., a plaintiff has 90 days to serve the complaint, or the action must be dismissed. On October 9, the plaintiff requested summonses for two of the three defendants in this action. It has not obtained a summons for the third. As of the date of this Order, no affidavit of service has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the initial pretrial co..
More
ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
The complaint in the above-captioned case was filed on July 29, 2019. Under Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., a plaintiff has 90 days to serve the complaint, or the action must be dismissed. On October 9, the plaintiff requested summonses for two of the three defendants in this action. It has not obtained a summons for the third. As of the date of this Order, no affidavit of service has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the initial pretrial conference is adjourned sine die.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by December 18, 2019, the plaintiff shall file a letter to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
