Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SLADE v. ASTRUE, 10-6756. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20120326561 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. WILLIAM DITTER, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 23 day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the brief in support of request for review filed by plaintiff (Doc. No. 11) and defendant's response and plaintiff's reply thereto (Doc. Nos. 14 & 15), and having found after careful and independent consideration of the record that the ALJ committed legal error, I conclude that the action must be remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Therefore, for the reas
More

ORDER

J. WILLIAM DITTER, Jr., District Judge.

AND NOW, this 23 day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the brief in support of request for review filed by plaintiff (Doc. No. 11) and defendant's response and plaintiff's reply thereto (Doc. Nos. 14 & 15), and having found after careful and independent consideration of the record that the ALJ committed legal error, I conclude that the action must be remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum above, I hereby ORDER that:

1. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY for the purposes of this remand only and the relief sought by Plaintiff is GRANTED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication; and 2. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to mark this case closed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer