Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BATCH v. GEAGAN, 2:11-cv-875. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130620e66 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge. Following Plaintiff's filing a Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 57] and a Supplement thereto [ECF No. 78], and Defendant Geagan's having filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 60] and a Supplemental Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 93], a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 113] dated May 10, 2013, was filed recommending that Geagan's Motions to Dismiss be granted in their entirety with prejudice. Plaintif
More

ORDER

JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge.

Following Plaintiff's filing a Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 57] and a Supplement thereto [ECF No. 78], and Defendant Geagan's having filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 60] and a Supplemental Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 93], a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 113] dated May 10, 2013, was filed recommending that Geagan's Motions to Dismiss be granted in their entirety with prejudice. Plaintiff was directed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation no later than fourteen days following the date of service of the Report and Recommendation. As of the date of this order, no objections have been filed.

Upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS NOW, this 19th day of June, 2013, ORDERED that the Defendant's Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and the Supplemented Amended Complaint [ECF Nos. 60, 93] are GRANTED with prejudice as to all claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer