RUDD v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE, CIV-13-416-FHS-SPS. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20140410c49
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On February 13, 2014, this Court entered two orders which dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See, Dkt. Nos. 32 and 33. Plaintiff was given fourteen (14) days to file a second amended complaint. On February 28, 2014, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff an additional fourteen (14) days to file his amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff still has not filed a new amended comp
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On February 13, 2014, this Court entered two orders which dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See, Dkt. Nos. 32 and 33. Plaintiff was given fourteen (14) days to file a second amended complaint. On February 28, 2014, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff an additional fourteen (14) days to file his amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff still has not filed a new amended compl..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge.
On February 13, 2014, this Court entered two orders which dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See, Dkt. Nos. 32 and 33. Plaintiff was given fourteen (14) days to file a second amended complaint. On February 28, 2014, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff an additional fourteen (14) days to file his amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff still has not filed a new amended complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to this Court's prior orders, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
It is so Ordered.
Source: Leagle