Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Britton v. ServiceLink Field Services, LLC, 2:18-CV-0041-TOR. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180921f46 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED FED. R. EVID. 502(d) ORDER THOMAS O. RICE , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the parties' Stipulated Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) Order which was heard without oral argument. Based on the parties' stipulation, the following Stipulated Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) Order is HEREBY ENTERED: I. APPLICABILITY This Order shall be applicable to and govern all information produced by the parties or made available for inspection (collectively "Information"). II. PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY MATER
More

STIPULATED FED. R. EVID. 502(d) ORDER

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulated Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) Order which was heard without oral argument. Based on the parties' stipulation, the following Stipulated Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) Order is HEREBY ENTERED:

I. APPLICABILITY

This Order shall be applicable to and govern all information produced by the parties or made available for inspection (collectively "Information").

II. PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS CONTAINING POTENTIALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

1. The production of any Information in this proceeding shall not, for the purposes of this proceeding or any other proceeding in any other court, be deemed a waiver or impairment of any claim of privilege or protection, including, but not limited to, the attorney-client privilege, the protection afforded to work-product materials, or the subject matter thereof, or any other privilege or protection recognized by law.

2. The producing party may notify the receiving party, in writing, upon discovery that privileged and/or work-product material has been produced. Upon receiving written notice from the producing party that privileged and/or workproduct material has been produced, the receiving party shall within five (5) business days of receipt of such notice—unless it contests the claim of attorney-client privilege or work product protection or other protection: (i) return all such Information, and all copies thereof, to the producing party; (ii) attempt, in good faith, to retrieve and return or destroy all copies of the documents in electronic format; and (iii) provide a certification of counsel that all such Information has been returned or destroyed. The receiving party shall not use such information for any purpose.

3. If the receiving party contests the claim of attorney-client privilege or work product protection or other protection, the receiving party shall give the producing party written notice of the reason for said disagreement. However, the receiving party may not challenge the privilege or immunity claim by arguing that the disclosure itself is a waiver of any applicable privilege. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute through good faith efforts to meet and confer, then the receiving party may, within fifteen (15) business days from the initial notice by the producing party, seek an Order from the Court compelling the production of the material. The parties may extend this deadline by agreement in writing. If the receiving party seeks to file the Information with its motion, then the receiving party must seek to file any Information under seal for in camera review by the Court and may not disclose, rely on, or refer to any of the Information in any public filing. Pending resolution of the motion, the receiving party must sequester the Information and not use the Information or disclose it to any person other than as required by law.

4. Any analyses, memoranda or notes which were internally generated based upon such produced Information shall immediately be sequestered, and shall be destroyed in the event that (a) the receiving party does not contest that the Information is privileged, or (b) the Court rules that the Information is privileged. Such analyses, memoranda or notes may only be utilized by the receiving party in the event that (a) the producing party agrees in writing that the Information is not privileged, or (b) the Court rules that the Information is not privileged.

5. Nothing in this Order shall relieve counsel for any receiving party of any existing duty or obligation, whether established by case law, rule of court, ethics rule, regulation or other source, to return, and not to review, any privileged or work product materials without being requested by the producing party to do so. Rather, in the event a receiving party becomes aware that it is in possession of what appears to be privileged documents or materials, then counsel for the receiving party shall immediately: (i) cease any further review or use of that document or material and (ii) notify the producing party of the apparent production of Information and inquire whether the documents or materials are protected Information. In the event the producing party confirms the documents or material are protected Information, then the receiving party shall comply with the terms of this Order in all respects.

6. The parties retain the right to review documents for responsiveness, privilege or other considerations before production.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer