Lowry v. University of Oregon Medical School, 3:16-cv-01049-YY. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20181105h10
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN , Senior District Judge . Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and Recommendation (#48) on September 28, 2018, in which she recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part the Motion (#41) for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants University of Oregon Medical School; Oregon Health & Science University; and Everett W. Lovrien, M.D. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN , Senior District Judge . Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and Recommendation (#48) on September 28, 2018, in which she recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part the Motion (#41) for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants University of Oregon Medical School; Oregon Health & Science University; and Everett W. Lovrien, M.D. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no ..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and Recommendation (#48) on September 28, 2018, in which she recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part the Motion (#41) for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants University of Oregon Medical School; Oregon Health & Science University; and Everett W. Lovrien, M.D. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation (#48). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part Defendants' Motion (#42) for Summary Judgment, DISMISSES Plaintiff's Claim Five for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent, and otherwise DENIES Defendants' Motion as to all other claims.
The Court returns this matter to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
