Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDWARD G. SMITH , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2018, after considering the motions for relief from final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) filed by the petitioner (Doc. Nos. 56, 82), the supplemental memorandum in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 95), the response in opposition filed by the respondents (Doc. No. 105), and the reply in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 110); accordingly,
Summary: ORDER EDWARD G. SMITH , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2018, after considering the motions for relief from final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) filed by the petitioner (Doc. Nos. 56, 82), the supplemental memorandum in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 95), the response in opposition filed by the respondents (Doc. No. 105), and the reply in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 110); accordingly, i..
More
ORDER
EDWARD G. SMITH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, after considering the motions for relief from final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) filed by the petitioner (Doc. Nos. 56, 82), the supplemental memorandum in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 95), the response in opposition filed by the respondents (Doc. No. 105), and the reply in support of the motions filed by the petitioner (Doc. No. 110); accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to remove this action from civil suspense and return it to the court's active docket;
2. The petitioner's motions for relief (Doc. Nos. 56, 82) are DENIED;
3. The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and is therefore not entitled to a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2);1 and
4. The clerk of court shall mark this case as CLOSED.
FootNotes
1. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (explaining requirements for obtaining a certificate of appealability under section 2253(c)(2)).
