Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BOON, 11-CR-6083. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. New York Number: infdco20150217d86 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2015
Summary: DECISION and ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge. This case was referred by order of the undersigned, docketed May 2, 2011, ECF No. 2, to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On September 10, 2012, Defendant Donna Boon filed an omnibus motion seeking various forms of relief, including applications to suppress wiretap evidence, statements, and tangible evidence, ECF No. 277. 1 Regarding Defendant's applications to suppress, an evidentiary hearing
More

DECISION and ORDER

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

This case was referred by order of the undersigned, docketed May 2, 2011, ECF No. 2, to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On September 10, 2012, Defendant Donna Boon filed an omnibus motion seeking various forms of relief, including applications to suppress wiretap evidence, statements, and tangible evidence, ECF No. 277.1

Regarding Defendant's applications to suppress, an evidentiary hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Payson on December 7, 2012, ECF No. 338, and a transcript of the proceeding was filed on January 11, 2013, ECF No. 353. On December 12, 2013, Magistrate Judge Payson filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 449, recommending that Defendant's applications to suppress wiretap evidence, statements, and tangible evidence be denied. On January 28, 2014, Defendant filed objections to the R&R, ECF No. 466.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the R & R to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the R&R, ECF No. 449, including wiretap applications and warrants, the search warrant and application for 3658 Batavia Elba Townline Road, and the transcript of the evidentiary hearing and exhibits received, the Court accepts Magistrate Judge Payson's proposed findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Payson's R&R, ECF No. 449, Defendant's applications to suppress wiretap evidence, statements, and tangible evidence are all denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Boon withdrew her application to suppress jailhouse recordings.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer