Kevin W. v. Berryhill, 6:17-cv-1181-YY. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20181026e90
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on August 14, 2018 in which she recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tap
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on August 14, 2018 in which she recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapi..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on August 14, 2018 in which she recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [16]. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party or parties in this case.
Source: Leagle
