U.S. v. WATLINGTON, 10-7644. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110620084
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel Watlington appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a nunc pro tunc order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington , No. 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny Watlington's motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel Watlington appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a nunc pro tunc order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington , No. 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny Watlington's motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Watlington appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a nunc pro tunc order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny Watlington's motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
