SHAFER v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION & CORRECTIONS, 2:13-cv-731. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140512m38
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: May 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. On March 31, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Abel, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Timothy E. Shafer's ("Plaintiff") motion to dismiss without prejudice in this prisoner civil rights case. ECF No. 24. The Report and Recommendation recommended granting Plaintiffs motion and d
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. On March 31, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Abel, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Timothy E. Shafer's ("Plaintiff") motion to dismiss without prejudice in this prisoner civil rights case. ECF No. 24. The Report and Recommendation recommended granting Plaintiffs motion and di..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On March 31, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Abel, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Timothy E. Shafer's ("Plaintiff") motion to dismiss without prejudice in this prisoner civil rights case. ECF No. 24. The Report and Recommendation recommended granting Plaintiffs motion and dismissing the action without prejudice.
The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Report and Recommendation further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. Report and Recommendation 1-2, ECF No. 24. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
