IN THE MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. v. PERLMAN, innyco20111103361 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of New York
Number: innyco20111103361
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an atto
Summary: PER CURIAM. Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attor..
More
PER CURIAM.
Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.
Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.
Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Source: Leagle
