HILL v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, 1:11-CV-00830. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120504h07
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 03, 2012
Latest Update: May 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 15). Proper Notice was given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters , 638 F.2d 947 (6 th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Having revi
Summary: ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 15). Proper Notice was given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters , 638 F.2d 947 (6 th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Having revie..
More
ORDER
S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 15).
Proper Notice was given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct. The Court therefore adopts and affirms it in its entirety and therefore GRANTS the City Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 10). The City is thus terminated as a defendant in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
