Luis v. Zang, 1:12cv629. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190322e73
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on September 7, 2018 (Doc. 244), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 21, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant's m
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on September 7, 2018 (Doc. 244), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 21, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant's mo..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on September 7, 2018 (Doc. 244), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 21, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant's motion for Rule 11 sanctions is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
