CLARK v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, 3:15-CV-338-MOC-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150828874
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration" (Document No. 5) filed August 27, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Joint Motio
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration" (Document No. 5) filed August 27, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Joint Motion..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration" (Document No. 5) filed August 27, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Joint Motion To Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration" (Document No. 5) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Status Report, jointly if possible, on October 27, 2015, and every sixty (60) days thereafter until otherwise ordered.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
