Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HAGEN v. CITY OF EUGENE, 06:10-CV-6100-AA. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20120608e28 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs. Defendants object to plaintiff's fee request but do not oppose plaintiff's Bill of Costs. On March 23, 2012, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff in accordance with the jury verdict. The case was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988 (b), the court, in its discretion, may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party for actions brought under section 1983. Pl
More

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs. Defendants object to plaintiff's fee request but do not oppose plaintiff's Bill of Costs.

On March 23, 2012, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff in accordance with the jury verdict. The case was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (b), the court, in its discretion, may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party for actions brought under section 1983.

Plaintiff moves attorney's fees in the amount of $108,114. Plaintiff requests reimbursement for 292.2 hours at $370.00 per hour. Defendants do not oppose the number of hours incurred by plaintiff, but do oppose the hourly rates requested. Plaintiff relies on the 2008 Oregon State Bar Economic Survey holding that 78% of the respondents with experience commensurate with plaintiff's counsel bill between $200 and $400 per hour. Therefore, plaintiff argues that $300 per hour is a reasonable hourly charge. However, based on the "specialized training and experience" brought to this case, plaintiff argues that an upward adjustment to $350 per hour is reasonable. Adjusting for inflation, the reasonable hourly rate becomes $369.95 hour (inflation rate 5.7% in 2012) multiplied by 292.2 hours for a total fee request of $108,099.39.

Defendants, on the other hand, argue that the Oregon State Bar's 2008 survey of the OSB Civil Rights section notes that the average hourly rate for First Amendment litigation was $225 to $274 per hour.1 Defendants suggest an hourly rate of $250 in 2008 dollars, adjusted for inflation, would be an appropriate rate. Applying the 5.7% inflation rate, the rate suggested by defendants is $264.25 per hour multiplied by 292.2 hours for a total fee award of $77,213.85. I note, however, that the OSB Civil Rights Section survey shows that 45% of the respondents reported a hourly rate of $200 to $299, and 27% of the respondents reported a hourly rate of $300 to $399. Given the fact that plaintiff's counsel has 28 years of litigation experience, is reasonable that his fees fall within the $300 to $399 respondent category.

Therefore, I find that $300 per hour is a reasonable hourly fee charged by plaintiff's counsel. I also find it reasonable and appropriate to adjust upward his fee by $50 per hour due to the specialized training and experience he brought to this case. That results in a total hourly charge of $350 per hour. Adding in the 5.7 percentage rate for inflation, a reasonable hourly rate for legal services by plaintiff's counsel is $369.95 per hour. The attorney hours worked in this cases total 292.2, multiplied by $369.95 per hour, results in a attorney fee award of $108,099.39.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (doc. 110) is granted in the amount of $108,099.39. Plaintiff's Bill of Costs (doc. 111) is granted in the amount $1319.31.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendants also cite to a 2007 Economic Survey by the Oregon State Bar. The court will disregard this survey as it was supplanted by the 2008 Oregon State Bar Survey.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer