Rosenfield v. Forest City Enterprises, L.P., 17-2054. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180329g68
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2018 , upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 3), Defendants' response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 5), Plaintiff's supplemental brief (ECF No. 14); after a hearing on the record with counsel for the parties; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 3) is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 3), Defendants' response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 5), Plaintiff's supplemental brief (ECF No. 14); after a hearing on the record with counsel for the parties; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 3) is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
