Snowden v. Bracy, 4:17CV208. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190722a31
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ENTRY JAMES G. CARR, SR. , District Judge . In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with the Judgment, It is hereby, ORDERED THAT: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc 20) be, and the same hereby is adopted as supplemented herein; 2. Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 21) be, and the same hereby are overruled; 3. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 1) be, and the same hereby is denied and dismis
Summary: JUDGMENT ENTRY JAMES G. CARR, SR. , District Judge . In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with the Judgment, It is hereby, ORDERED THAT: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc 20) be, and the same hereby is adopted as supplemented herein; 2. Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 21) be, and the same hereby are overruled; 3. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 1) be, and the same hereby is denied and dismiss..
More
JUDGMENT ENTRY
JAMES G. CARR, SR., District Judge.
In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with the Judgment, It is hereby,
ORDERED THAT:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc 20) be, and the same hereby is adopted as supplemented herein;
2. Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 21) be, and the same hereby are overruled;
3. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 1) be, and the same hereby is denied and dismissed, with prejudice; and
4. Petitioner's motion to apply "legal innocence" standard (Doc. 23) be, and the same hereby is denied.
Jurists of reasons could not reasonably dispute the result reached herein or its rationale. I decline, therefore, to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
