Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

REDDEN v. COLVIN, 5:14-cv-04452. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. West Virginia Number: infdco20140507d52 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: May 06, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge. By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on February 2, 2014, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). On April 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 9) wherein it is recommended that this Court gran
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge.

By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on February 2, 2014, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 9) wherein it is recommended that this Court grant the Defendant's Motion to Remand (Document 8) and remand the case to the Commissioner pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as outlined in the Defendant's motion. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by May 2, 2014.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and ORDERS that the Defendant's Motion to Remand (Document 8) be GRANTED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings as outlined in the Defendant's motion.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Tinsley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer