Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BERTRAM v. COLVIN, 3:12-cv-00955-TC. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20130610c37 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2013
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. On April 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation, finding that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record and recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district cou
More

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge.

On April 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation, finding that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record and recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Judge Coffin's opinion, and I I find no error.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 15) filed April 9, 2013 is ADOPTED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer