HORTON v. FEDCHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, 16-0318. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20161014g80
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. WILLIAM DITTER, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 12 th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Complaint in Favor of Binding Arbitration (Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition Brief (Doc. No. 15), and Defendants' Reply Brief (Doc. No. 18), I HEREBY ORDER that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Action in Favor of Binding Arbitration is DENIED . 2. Within 20 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall joint
Summary: ORDER J. WILLIAM DITTER, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 12 th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Complaint in Favor of Binding Arbitration (Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition Brief (Doc. No. 15), and Defendants' Reply Brief (Doc. No. 18), I HEREBY ORDER that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Action in Favor of Binding Arbitration is DENIED . 2. Within 20 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall jointl..
More
ORDER
J. WILLIAM DITTER, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Complaint in Favor of Binding Arbitration (Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition Brief (Doc. No. 15), and Defendants' Reply Brief (Doc. No. 18), I HEREBY ORDER that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Action in Favor of Binding Arbitration is DENIED.
2. Within 20 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall jointly submit a schedule governing discovery on the issue of arbitrability.
3. At the conclusion of discovery, I will issue a scheduling order regarding the filing of a renewed motion to compel arbitration, if necessary.
Source: Leagle
