Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

POTTS v. J & B FOODS OF SIKESTON, INC., 331 S.W.3d 355 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri Number: inadvmoco110527000434 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2011
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Janet Potts (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred because: (1) the Division of Employment Security lacked the jurisdiction and authority to consider the untimely protest filed by Claimant's employer; and (2) Claimant did not commit misconduct connected with her work. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal an
More

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Janet Potts (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred because: (1) the Division of Employment Security lacked the jurisdiction and authority to consider the untimely protest filed by Claimant's employer; and (2) Claimant did not commit misconduct connected with her work.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer