HOWARD v. ASTRUE, CV. 09-1508-HZ. (2011)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20110606773
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2011
Summary: ORDER MARCO HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19) on April 26, 2011, in which he recommends that the Commissioner's final decision in connection with Plaintiff's June 13, 2005, application for SSI benefits be affirmed. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relie
Summary: ORDER MARCO HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19) on April 26, 2011, in which he recommends that the Commissioner's final decision in connection with Plaintiff's June 13, 2005, application for SSI benefits be affirmed. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am reliev..
More
ORDER
MARCO HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19) on April 26, 2011, in which he recommends that the Commissioner's final decision in connection with Plaintiff's June 13, 2005, application for SSI benefits be affirmed. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (doc. #19). Accordingly, the Commissioner's final decision in connection with Plaintiff's June 13, 2005, application for SSI benefits is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
