Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ford v. City of Harrisburg, 1:17-cv-00908. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190917e26 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . AND NOW , on this 16th day of September 2019, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, and upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. The Court ADOPTS in part the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 41) of Magistrate Judge Carlson insofar as it recommends that this Court dismiss counts 4 and 5 of Plaintiff's amended complaint; 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 28) is
More

ORDER

AND NOW, on this 16th day of September 2019, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, and upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court ADOPTS in part the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 41) of Magistrate Judge Carlson insofar as it recommends that this Court dismiss counts 4 and 5 of Plaintiff's amended complaint; 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED with respect to counts 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Plaintiff's amended complaint, and those counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff's pendent state law claims (counts 3, 6 and 7) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer