Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. McINTYRE, 13-361. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140723e37 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motions of defendant Rahim McIntyre for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. ##87 and 94) are DENIED; and (2) the motions of defendant Rahim McIntyre for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. ##88 and 93) are DENIED.

ORDER

HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motions of defendant Rahim McIntyre for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. ##87 and 94) are DENIED; and

(2) the motions of defendant Rahim McIntyre for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. ##88 and 93) are DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer