Fultz v. RR Donnelley & Sons Company Long Term Disability Plan, 15-0319. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160602f79
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is DENIED . 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is also DENIED . 3. Notwithstanding the denial of both motions, this matter is REMANDED to the plan administrator for a determination as described in the accompanying memorandum o
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is DENIED . 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is also DENIED . 3. Notwithstanding the denial of both motions, this matter is REMANDED to the plan administrator for a determination as described in the accompanying memorandum op..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is also DENIED.
3. Notwithstanding the denial of both motions, this matter is REMANDED to the plan administrator for a determination as described in the accompanying memorandum opinion.
Source: Leagle
