Filed: May 29, 2015
Latest Update: May 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 29 day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the "Municipal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 94), the "Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 97), and "Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 100), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, that: 1. T
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 29 day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the "Municipal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 94), the "Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 97), and "Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 100), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, that: 1. Th..
More
ORDER
DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 29 day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the "Municipal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 94), the "Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 97), and "Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment," (Doc. No. 100), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, that:
1. The John and Jane Doe Defendants are DISMISSED;
2. Plaintiffs' claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, (Count XII), conspiracy, (Counts VI & VII), and assault and battery, (Count XIV), are DISMISSED; and
3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all remaining claims against Defendants Frank Straup and the City of Philadelphia.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERD THAT:
4. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants Frank Straup and the City of Philadelphia against Plaintiffs; and
5. "Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Expert Witness Jesus M. Serrano," (Doc. No. 101), is DISMISSED as moot.
The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
