ROOSEVELT BANKS v. KMART CORPORATION, 12-607. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120307c74
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, Judge. AND NOW, this 6 th day of March, 2012, upon careful consideration of the plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No. 6), and the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED. 2. The plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED as moot.
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2012, upon careful consideration of the plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No. 6), and the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED.
2. The plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
