CURTIS v. WETZEL, 14-0786. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150901c60
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Wetzel, Klopotoski, and Wenerowicz (Document #16); the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Lewis and Shaylor (Document #17); and the plaintiff's responses thereto (Document #28 and 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motions to dismiss are GRANTED in their entirety. 2. The five moving defendants are DISMISSED from this action. 3. Coun
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Wetzel, Klopotoski, and Wenerowicz (Document #16); the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Lewis and Shaylor (Document #17); and the plaintiff's responses thereto (Document #28 and 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motions to dismiss are GRANTED in their entirety. 2. The five moving defendants are DISMISSED from this action. 3. Count..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Wetzel, Klopotoski, and Wenerowicz (Document #16); the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Lewis and Shaylor (Document #17); and the plaintiff's responses thereto (Document #28 and 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motions to dismiss are GRANTED in their entirety.
2. The five moving defendants are DISMISSED from this action.
3. Count Two is DISMISSED in its entirety.
4. The claims in Counts One and Three against all remaining defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. The claims against them in their individual capacities shall proceed.
Source: Leagle
