United States v. Jack, 2:19-cr-00145-RSL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190912548
Visitors: 26
Filed: Sep. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2019
Summary: [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR FILING RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT (Dkt. 21) ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The matter coming before this Court based on the stipulation of the Parties to address the briefing schedule for the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 21), this Court hereby finds and ORDERS: 1. That the date by which the government should file and serve an Answer in accordance with Rule Local Criminal
Summary: [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR FILING RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT (Dkt. 21) ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The matter coming before this Court based on the stipulation of the Parties to address the briefing schedule for the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 21), this Court hereby finds and ORDERS: 1. That the date by which the government should file and serve an Answer in accordance with Rule Local Criminal ..
More
[Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR FILING RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEF TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT (Dkt. 21)
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
The matter coming before this Court based on the stipulation of the Parties to address the briefing schedule for the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 21), this Court hereby finds and ORDERS:
1. That the date by which the government should file and serve an Answer in accordance with Rule Local Criminal Rule 12 of the Rules Governing Pleadings and Pretrial Motions in United States District Courts should be extended until on or before September 11, 2019, and that the government will endeavor to file the Response before that date if possible.
2. Counsel for the Defendant-Petitioner shall file its optional reply on or before September 13, 2019.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
