U.S. v. WOMACK, 13-206-1. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140724e03
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2014, upon consideration of the numerous pretrial motions filed by the parties and the responses thereto, following a motions hearing and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: — Defendant's "Motion to Compel Discovery/To Remove Protective Order" (Doc. No. 69) is DENIED as moot; — Defendant's "Motion to Set Bail" (Doc. No. 70) is DENIED, as it has been withdrawn by Defendant; — Defe
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2014, upon consideration of the numerous pretrial motions filed by the parties and the responses thereto, following a motions hearing and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: — Defendant's "Motion to Compel Discovery/To Remove Protective Order" (Doc. No. 69) is DENIED as moot; — Defendant's "Motion to Set Bail" (Doc. No. 70) is DENIED, as it has been withdrawn by Defendant; — Defen..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2014, upon consideration of the numerous pretrial motions filed by the parties and the responses thereto, following a motions hearing and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:
— Defendant's "Motion to Compel Discovery/To Remove Protective Order" (Doc. No. 69) is DENIED as moot;
— Defendant's "Motion to Set Bail" (Doc. No. 70) is DENIED, as it has been withdrawn by Defendant;
— Defendant's Motions to Dismiss the Indictment (Doc. Nos. 73, 78, 85) are DENIED;
— Defendant's Motions for Franks Hearing (Doc. Nos. 74, 80) are DENIED;
— Defendant's Motions to Suppress (Doc. Nos. 81, 114) are DENIED;
— Defendant's "Motion to Address Fraud on the Court" (Doc. No. 104) is DENIED;
— "Non-Party Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena to Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Criminal Case" (Doc. No. 125) is GRANTED; and
— "Government's Motion in Limine for a Determination that Records Qualify as Business Records Under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6)" (Doc. No. 127) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
