Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PAGAN, 03-621-01. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150923d92 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2015
Summary: BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW this 22 day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the Defendant's Pro Se Motion for a Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S. C. 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, and the government's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the government's response.

AND NOW this 22 day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the Defendant's Pro Se Motion for a Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, and the government's response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED

that the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the government's response.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer