Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER STEPHANIE L. HAINES , District Judge . This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S. C. 636, and Local Civil Rule 72. The Magistrate Judge filed an Order, Report and Recommendation on January 8, 2020 at ECF No. 18. 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), the Magistrate Judge is to make a recommendation to the District Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Mot
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER STEPHANIE L. HAINES , District Judge . This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S. C. 636, and Local Civil Rule 72. The Magistrate Judge filed an Order, Report and Recommendation on January 8, 2020 at ECF No. 18. 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), the Magistrate Judge is to make a recommendation to the District Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Moti..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STEPHANIE L. HAINES, District Judge.
This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S. C. §636, and Local Civil Rule 72.
The Magistrate Judge filed an Order, Report and Recommendation on January 8, 2020 at ECF No. 18.1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Magistrate Judge is to make a recommendation to the District Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 12). The Report and Recommendation portion of the Order, Report and Recommendation at ECF 18 recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 12) be denied. The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the recommendation portion of the Order, Report and Recommendation (ECF 18). While Plaintiff filed three documents notifying the Court of changes in address (ECF 19, 20, and 21), no party filed any objections and the time to do so has expired.2
After a review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation portion of the Order, Report and Recommendation (ECF 18) under the "reasoned consideration" standard, see EEOC V City ofLong Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (standard ofreview when no timely and specific objections are filed), the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2020, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation portion of the Order, Report and Recommendation (ECF 18) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
