Ali v. Glunt, 14-2597. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160425989
Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this ___ 21st ___ day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the parties' briefs, United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, 1 it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED . 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED an
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this ___ 21st ___ day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the parties' briefs, United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, 1 it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED . 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and..
More
ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ___ 21st ___ day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the parties' briefs, United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation,1 it is ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED.
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
FootNotes
1. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), I must make a de novo determination of the portions of the R&R to which Ali objects.
Source: Leagle
