HARRIS v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., 14-0704. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141107b56
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2014
Summary: Order Adopting Report And Recommendation ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 29) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 12) be denied. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November 3, 2014. No objections were filed. The matter is ripe for disposition. The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which
Summary: Order Adopting Report And Recommendation ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 29) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 12) be denied. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November 3, 2014. No objections were filed. The matter is ripe for disposition. The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which o..
More
Order Adopting Report And Recommendation
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 29) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 12) be denied. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November 3, 2014. No objections were filed. The matter is ripe for disposition.
The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 877 (3d Cir.1987). This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The district court judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
